A race Pakistan cannot win The Statesman 20 Nov 18
A race Pakistan cannot win 20 Nov 18
The completion of the first deterrence patrol by INS Arihant, India’s first home developed nuclear powered submarine, completing the nuclear deterrence triad, procurement of the S 400 missile systems from Russia and the induction of new heavy calibre guns for the artillery are changing the balance of power in the subcontinent. There was immense criticism by Pak in every forum, including international gatherings, when India signed the S 400 missile deal.
They projected the shifting of balance of power in India’s favour leading to increased security concerns. Pak sought to draw in the entire subcontinent being impacted by security concerns, which was ignored by South Asian nations and the world community as they realized that apart from Pak, India has no adversary in South Asia.
Similar criticism flowed when INS Arihant was inducted into the service. The Pak foreign ministry spokesperson stated, ‘This development marks the first actual deployment of ready to fire nuclear warheads in South Asia. This is a matter of concern not only for the Indian Ocean littoral states but also for the international community at large’. In each case it projected its desire for peace as also its preparedness for war.
Pak has yet to comment on the induction of new artillery guns, which could change the equation in conventional operations as also cross-border violations. It permits the Indian army to strike deep into Pak territory hitting administrative bases and terrorist camps, which earlier could only be targeted by cross-border strikes as employing rockets or air could add to escalation. The comment is likely to flow in the coming days, when these guns begin being deployed.
While Indian military power is aimed at deterrence from China, it is Pak which is panicking. The Pak armed forces are aware of India’s growing military might for conventional warfare as also its growing nuclear deterrence capability. However, their financial constraints have compelled them to counter the same by claiming deployment of tactical nuclear missiles. Their international standing has dropped to the level that assistance from all allies, including the US, has dried up forcing them to look at only China for support.
China is a ready provider for multiple reasons. Firstly, it must keep the Pak army in good humour. It is aware that its investments in the CPEC are secure provided it has the backing of the Pak army. Simultaneously, it cannot announce its true expenditure in the CPEC to the world as the Pak army has skimmed a part of the funds, almost terming it as a bribe for ensuring its continuity. Any action by Pak to limit the expansion of the CPEC would impact the power of Xi, as this project is the key to the Belt Road Initiative (BRI), which covers large parts of the globe.
Secondly, enhancing the military power of Pak would impact Indian defence expenditure as also its concentration of forces. As a result of Chinese support, diplomatic and military, India has always been forced to consider a two-front war. It has also provided Pak the confidence to continue pushing militants into Kashmir, keeping it destabilized.
As India restructures and modernizes its armed forces, it pushes Pak into a corner. Pak cannot bank on its so-called tactical nuclear weapons, as international pressure and swift Indian strikes may preclude its employment even within their own territory. The only option which it has is to run to the Chinese for near similar capabilities. Since it lacks financial stability including the ability to repay earlier loans, it may not get blanket Chinese support.
Pak is now moving towards the IMF for a bailout package, despite assistance already provided by Saudi Arabia and likely to be provided by China. The delay in China providing financial assistance is that it is bound to seek its pound of flesh, mainly ensuring the security and continuity of CPEC, where it has invested heavily. The IMF is bound to impose its own terms, some of which would be crippling and disadvantageous for the army including cutting down its defence expenditure.
The IMF terms would not be for a short duration but lengthy enough to pinch Pak. By curtailing the defence budget, it would restrict the ability for Pak to make new purchases to meet Indian capability expansion, adding to the growing capability gap. It could bank on Chinese largesse but the same would not be enough as repayment ability would be low.
The Pak army, which cannot be seen to be considered weaker as India continues to enhance military power, would be compelled to divert funds from other sources to meet its needs, seeking to hide their investments. These funds would impact social security services in Pak adding to problems of its population. While the ISI has complete control over the country and there are no voices which can criticise the actions of the army, internal rumblings against the government would rise.
One of the reasons for the collapse of the Soviet Union was it being pushed into an arms race with the US. It had to continue enhancing its military capabilities to ensure NATO remained at bay. It was forced into doing so, despite a vast gap in the economic status of the two countries. Thus, the arms race was unsustainable and broke the economy of the Soviet Union.
The Pak army has suffered in every war with India, hence is always concerned about Indian military power. It can never accept the fact that it can never compete militarily with India. The gap between the economies of India and Pak is similarly wide. Pushing Pak into an arms race, by continuing to grow Indian military power may have a similar result as the breakup of the Soviet Union.
About the Author
Maj Gen Harsha Kakkar
Retired Major General Indian Army